That sentence is the whole company. Everything we build follows from refusing to choose between capability and control.
The models are good enough. What is missing is everything around them: who is allowed to use what, on which data, with whose approval, at what cost, and with what record. Without that layer, AI in a company is a collection of private habits.
The answer is not to slow AI down. It is to give it somewhere legitimate to run — a place where an action can be proposed, understood, approved and traced. Capability and control are not a trade-off; the second is what makes the first usable at work.
We also think the people doing the work should benefit first. If a platform only makes management more informed and nobody's day easier, it will not be adopted, and an unadopted platform governs nothing.
Anything that writes, sends or spends can require a human signature. Automation without an owner is not a feature we will ship.
You bring your own provider accounts and pay them directly. Our incentive is the platform, not your token bill.
We would rather tell you what the product does not do yet than imply certifications and capabilities we cannot evidence.
Context about how work happens belongs to the organisation in aggregate and to each person about themselves. Not to surveillance.
Tandevia is operated by an established Czech software company with an audited management system, not by a first-time venture.
Everything above is a claim about how we build. The trial is where you check whether it is true.